KeyCorp (KEY) — BATS 13/100 — 2026-07-21

BotFlo AI Transformation Score

What is the BotFlo AI Transformation Score (BATS)?

Use the interactive report viewer to verify report details.

Full list of Earning Calls Summaries

Stock Analysis
– All links to the Stock Analysis website are affiliate links
– You can download the transcript for earnings calls for nearly all the companies on their site (requires a paid subscription)
– The BAT score is generated based on transcripts obtained using a different API

Listen to the earnings call audio for free on StockAnalysis

Summary based on KeyCorp earnings call on 2026-07-21

BotFlo AI Transformation Score for $KEY: 13 (13/100)

📣 1. AI MENTION LEVEL AND DEPTH SCORE: 2/6
0 None | ✅ 1-2 Light / passing mentions | 3-4 Moderate / multiple references | 5-6 Heavy + detailed throughout
AI appears only in limited Q&A as an external industry theme tied to power demand and second-derivative credit risk, not as a detailed internal AI program.

🎯 2. AI STRATEGIC CENTRALITY SCORE: 1/9
0 Not mentioned as strategic | ✅ 1-3 Supportive / peripheral | 4-6 Key enabler | 7-9 Core pillar / requires strategy evolution
AI is treated as a peripheral macro/credit backdrop for lending verticals rather than a core strategic pillar of KeyCorp’s own strategy.

🎙️ 3. MANAGEMENT TONE ON AI SCORE: 2/8
0 None / avoidant | ✅ 1-2 Cautious / measured | 3-5 Bullish | 6-8 Very bullish + transformative language + urgency
Tone is cautious and risk-aware, noting multi-year power shortages while flagging software and professional-services exposures if AI growth slows.

💡 4. REVENUE INNOVATION FOCUS SCORE: 0/8
✅ 0 No link to revenue | 1-3 General mentions | 4-6 Specific models (freemium, consumption, AI-first ARR) | 7-8 Major business model shift + quantified targets
No AI-linked revenue models, freemium, consumption pricing, or AI-first ARR targets were discussed.

⚙️ 5. AGENTIC AUTOMATION LEVEL SCORE: 0/8
✅ 0 None | 1-3 Basic automation / assistants | 4-6 Multiple agents + workflows mentioned | 7-8 Productized, enterprise-grade agentic systems + orchestration
No agentic systems, AI assistants, or automated agent workflows were mentioned.

🤝 6. CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE TRANSFORMATION SCORE: 0/7
✅ 0 No CX link | 1-3 Generic personalization | 4-5 AI-powered CX initiatives | 6-7 Full CX orchestration / enterprise transformation
No AI-powered customer experience or CX orchestration initiatives were described.

🏗️ 7. AI INFRASTRUCTURE PLATFORM INVESTMENT SCORE: 0/7
✅ 0 None | 1-3 Minimal / cloud usage only | 4-5 Significant partnerships or platforms | 6-7 Major custom infrastructure + acceleration (e.g. NVIDIA Foundry)
Management cited about $1 billion of tech and ops spend but did not frame it as AI infrastructure or platform investment.

📊 8. MEASURABLE IMPACT EVIDENCE QUALITY SCORE: 0/7
✅ 0 No metrics | 1-3 General claims | 4-5 Some quantified metrics | 6-7 Detailed, specific KPIs (ARR, MAU, adoption %, multiples)
No quantified AI adoption, productivity, ARR, or KPI metrics were provided.

💰 9. FINANCIAL IMPACT DIRECTION TRADEOFFS SCORE: 1/6
0 Not mentioned | ✅ 1-2 Neutral / mixed | 3-4 Positive but vague | 5-6 Explicit positive impact + raised guidance despite trade-offs
AI was linked only indirectly to lending demand in power and electrical infrastructure, without explicit AI P&L trade-offs or guidance raises.

🗺️ 10. FUTURE PLANS STRENGTH SPECIFICITY SCORE: 1/6
0 None | ✅ 1-2 Vague | 3-4 Moderate guidance / next steps | 5-6 Detailed roadmap or clear timing
Plans are limited to ongoing discussion and quarterly portfolio reviews of AI second-derivative risks, without a detailed AI roadmap.

🔬 11. HYPE VS EXECUTION BALANCE SCORE: 3/6
0 Pure hype, no execution | 1-2 Hype heavy | ✅ 3-4 Balanced | 5-6 Strong execution focus with shipped results
Management avoided AI product hype and stayed execution-oriented on credit identification and portfolio rigor around AI-related exposures.

⚖️ 12. GOVERNANCE RISK ETHICS DEPTH SCORE: 2/5
0 None | ✅ 1-2 Minimal mention | 3-4 Partial (brand safety, compliance, auditable workflows) | 5 Detailed governance framework
Risk governance is partial: quarterly portfolio reviews and hotspot scanning for AI second-derivative credit exposures, without a full AI ethics framework.

⚡ 13. EFFICIENCY PRODUCTIVITY FOCUS SCORE: 0/5
✅ 0 None | 1-2 Light / vendor only | 3-4 Internal productivity + cost savings | 5 Disciplined reallocation + quantified gains
No internal AI-driven productivity or cost-savings claims were made.

🏢 14. INTERNAL ADOPTION CULTURAL SIGNALS SCORE: 0/4
✅ 0 None | 1-2 Low / anecdotal | 3 Medium (some metrics or programs) | 4 High + cultural integration
No employee AI adoption metrics, training programs, or cultural integration signals were discussed.

📈 15. OVERALL AI MATURITY COHERENCE SCORE: 1/8
✅ 0-2 Minimal / early | 3-4 Developing | 5-6 Advanced | 7-8 Mature & coherent strategy
Overall AI maturity is minimal and early: AI is an external credit/industry lens, not a coherent internal AI transformation strategy.

Sector AI Transformation Score for $KEY: 7 (7/50)

🕵️ 1. FRAUD DETECTION LEVEL SCORE: 0/5
✅ 0 None | 1 Low | 2-3 Medium | 4-5 High
Fraud detection AI was not discussed.

🏦 2. CREDIT RISK UNDERWRITING LEVEL SCORE: 2/5
0 None | 1 Low | ✅ 2-3 Medium | 4-5 High
Medium-low: management links AI-driven power shortages to lending focus and discusses monitoring second-derivative borrower risks, but not AI underwriting models.

📐 3. RISK MODELING CAPITAL ALLOCATION LEVEL SCORE: 1/5
0 None | ✅ 1 Low | 2-3 Medium | 4-5 High
Only light linkage via traditional portfolio reviews and qualitative reserve overlays; no AI-specific risk models or capital allocation engines described.

⚖️ 4. COMPLIANCE REGULATORY AI LEVEL SCORE: 0/5
✅ 0 None | 1 Low | 2-3 Medium | 4-5 High
No compliance or regulatory AI use cases were mentioned.

✨ 5. CUSTOMER PERSONALIZATION LEVEL SCORE: 0/5
✅ 0 None | 1 Low | 2-3 Medium | 4-5 High
No AI-driven customer personalization was discussed.

⚙️ 6. AGENTIC WORKFLOWS AUTOMATION LEVEL SCORE: 0/5
✅ 0 None | 1 Low | 2-3 Medium | 4-5 High
No agentic banking workflows or automation platforms were described.

🕸️ 7. UNIFIED AI PLATFORM OR AGENTIC MESH SCORE: 0/5
✅ 0 None | 1 Early | 2-3 Developing | 4-5 Advanced
No unified AI platform or agentic mesh was mentioned.

🧠 8. DATA FOUNDATION INTELLIGENCE LAYER SCORE: 0/5
✅ 0 None | 1 Weak | 2-3 Moderate | 4-5 Strong
No enterprise data foundation or intelligence layer for AI was discussed.

💵 9. EXPECTED FINANCIAL IMPACT SCORE: 2/5
0 Not mentioned | 1 Short-term pressure | ✅ 2-3 Neutral | 4-5 Positive ROA/efficiency
Neutral-to-modestly positive indirect impact via C&I growth in utilities, power, and renewables tied to AI-driven electricity demand, without quantified AI ROA.

🔒 10. GOVERNANCE RISK OVERSIGHT LEVEL SCORE: 2/5
0 None | 1 Basic | ✅ 2-3 Moderate | 4-5 Strong independent
Moderate traditional risk oversight with proactive identification and quarterly reviews applied to AI second-derivative hotspots, not a dedicated AI governance board framework.

Presentation

(1/5) Strong Q2 earnings momentum and raised confidence
• 📈 KeyCorp reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, up 26% year-over-year, with revenue up 7% and pre-provision net revenue up 9%.
• 💰 Net interest margin expanded sequentially to 2.89%, with management on track to meet or exceed 3% by year-end.
• 🎯 Management expressed greater confidence in generating ROTCE above 15% by end of 2027 on the path to a 16% to 19% long-term target.

(2/5) Commercial growth, deposits, and capital deployment
• 🏦 Period-end C&I loans rose $2.1 billion or 3% sequentially as Key attracted new clients and deepened relationships.
• 💵 The deposit franchise performed well with total deposit costs down 2 basis points, while asset quality stayed strong with NCOs at 42 basis points.
• 🔄 Key repurchased more than $340 million of stock in the quarter and remains on pace for at least $1.3 billion of full-year buybacks while announcing the Clearwater U.K. advisory acquisition.

(3/5) Fee businesses, wealth, and client momentum
• 📊 Priority fee businesses include investment banking, commercial payments, and wealth, with commercial loan pipelines up 6% year-over-year.
• 💼 Wealth AUM reached a record $74 billion, and the mass affluent strategy since 2023 has added 59,000 households and over $4 billion of AUM.
• 🧭 Relationship households rose 3% and commercial clients 2% year-over-year, with wealth still less than 10% penetrated in existing mass affluent households.

(4/5) CFO detail on NII, fees, expenses, and credit
• 📉 Tax-equivalent NII rose 9% year-over-year and 2% sequentially, while NIM increased 2 basis points to 2.89% on loan growth, fixed-rate repricing, and an extra day.
• 📑 Investment banking fees were $169 million in the quarter and $366 million in the first half, with pipelines up 9% linked quarter and 3Q IB fees expected up 20% plus.
• ⚠️ NCOs were 42 basis points and NPAs rose on three idiosyncratic credits, but management does not expect meaningful incremental losses or a change to the 40–45 bp full-year NCO outlook.

(5/5) Raised 2026 guidance and second-half outlook
• 📈 Full-year revenue growth guidance was raised to 7% to 8% and NII growth to 9% to 11%, with NIM exit now expected at 3% to 3.05%.
• 🚀 Average loan growth guidance rose to 4% to 5% and average commercial loans to 8% to 10% for the year.
• ⚖️ Guidance implies substantial positive operating leverage, with revenues expected to grow twice as fast as expenses in 2026 while expense growth remains in a 3% to 4% full-year range.

Q&A

(1/12) Q&A: NIM drivers and path to 3% plus
• 📉 NIM rose in Q2 but less than expected due to stronger higher-quality loan growth at tighter spreads, lower overnight SOFR, and wholesale funding used through a seasonal deposit trough.
• 🔧 Second-half supports include about $9 billion of fixed-asset repricing with roughly 1.25% pickup and about 2% or $3 billion of core operating deposit growth.
• ✅ Key sees a path to 3% plus NIM with relatively low execution risk if loan growth moderates and deposit costs stay stable absent hikes.

(2/12) Q&A: Investment banking miss and back-half pipelines
• 📉 IB results came in short of internal expectations after a record 1Q and tough 2025 comps, but first-half fees of $366 million were still up about 4%.
• 📊 Pipelines are up 9% linked quarter and 31% year-over-year, supporting confidence in mid-single-digit full-year IB growth and a 20% plus 3Q step-up.
• ⏳ Middle-market deal timing and a bifurcation toward larger transactions delayed closes, but engaged pipelines and a higher-for-longer rate backdrop are viewed as constructive for getting deals done.

(3/12) Q&A: Trading NIM for client growth versus ROTCE targets
• 🎯 Management does not see the 15% plus ROTCE by year-end 2027 target as conflicting with growing NII and EPS through targeted new clients.
• 🏦 About 58% of C&I loans are investment grade, and returns require expanding beyond initial capital provision into broader relationship products over time.
• 💵 On deposits, Clark cited good visibility to largely commercial relationship-driven growth and no concern about hitting Q4’27 return or related NIM targets.

(4/12) Q&A: Operating leverage sustainability and buyback priorities
• ⚖️ Assuming a constructive macro, Key feels comfortable sustaining operating leverage through expense discipline plus strong pipelines and business momentum.
• 💻 Investments continue, including hiring and about $1 billion of tech and ops spend this year, while expense growth still fights toward long-term targets.
• 🔄 Capital priorities remain clients first, then business investment, dividend, and buybacks last, with at least $1.3 billion of repurchases and a marked CET1 target around 9.5% to 10%.

(5/12) Q&A: Path from ~3% NIM exit to 3.25% and middle-market IB cycle
• 📈 Clark said the difference between a 3% and 3.05% 2026 exit should not threaten 2027, with about $30 billion of fixed-asset repricing through year-end 2027 supporting the structural path.
• ✅ Operating deposit growth and readiness for flat rates or hikes keep management confident the 3.25% NIM view remains intact.
• ⏳ Middle-market M&A is lagging large-cap activity; about 40% of fees are PE-driven and Key sees early innings of a middle-market renaissance as exits eventually clear.

(6/12) Q&A: Higher-quality loan mix, AI power demand, and fee follow-through
• 🏭 Tighter spreads reflect targeted investment-grade clients and capital-markets-oriented relationships rather than a broad unexplained industry shift.
• ⚡ Chris said much credit demand supports U.S. electrical infrastructure build-out, as AI has made shortages of power generation and distribution abundantly clear.
• 🎯 On new clients, Key expects to hit return hurdles within 12 to 18 months via disciplined six-month reviews and industry-focused cross-sell of payments, hedging, and advisory.

(7/12) Q&A: Intentional loan mix, NDFI, and why Q2 NIM under-shot
• 🧭 Focus remains on seven industry verticals where Key understands winners and losers; similarly graded spreads are only modestly tighter year-over-year.
• 📋 NDFI rose about $600 million including investment-grade REIT growth; Key is not avoiding NDFI labels but will walk from specialty-finance deals that do not make sense.
• ⏱️ The main Q2 NIM surprise was timing mismatch between asset growth and deposit trough; smoother NIM is expected if funding is filled with quality deposits as loan growth moderates.

(8/12) Q&A: Clearwater U.K. deal and capital-markets diversification
• 🌍 Clearwater is an M&A boutique JV partner for six years, adding U.K. and continental distribution for U.S. sell-side work and access to U.S. PE buyers for European sellers.
• 🤝 The deal is both offensive and defensive and is expected to buttress Key’s leading middle-market M&A practice after many joint transactions.
• 🔍 Broader expansion will stay adjacent to current expertise, including new cities and industry verticals with large fee pools where Key can win.

(9/12) Q&A: Pushback on 2% deposit growth and PE-driven IB recovery
• 💵 Chris defended deposit visibility via commercial primacy in 82% of deposits and knowledge of additional client balances that can be won at known prices.
• 📊 IB pipelines are described as real though timing is uncertain; management calls full-year targets conservative after a record prior year and record 1Q.
• ⏳ Key does need the roughly 40% sponsor fee mix to return and believes PE holders are last movers who must eventually exit to raise new funds, while C&I activity is already improving.

(10/12) Q&A: Deposit mix outlook and NPA resolution confidence
• 💵 Noninterest-bearing mix is expected to stay roughly flattish in the back half as strong operating deposits arrive partly in interest-bearing and hybrid accounts.
• 🏠 Consumer household growth continues via core checking, with only a modest second-half pickup expected in CD and MMDA production in select markets.
• ✅ Reserve release occurred despite higher NPAs because portfolio health improved; specific reserves and idiosyncratic multifamily, consumer, and ag names support low loss content and unchanged 40–45 bp NCO guide.

(11/12) Q&A: AI second-derivative credit risks and idiosyncratic NPL drivers
• 🤖 Management has begun discussing AI second-derivative exposures and expects multi-year strength in power generation and distribution because data centers consume city-scale electricity.
• ⚠️ Nearer-term watch areas include software companies, where direct exposure is under about $300 million, and professional services such as lawyers, consultants, and accountants where LLMs apply easily.
• 🔍 Quarterly portfolio reviews hunt emerging hotspots; the other NPL names reflected tariff-driven consumer bankruptcy and Western Washington ag labor constraints, not private credit migration.

(12/12) Q&A: Payments and wealth fee outlook and deposit competition
• 💳 Payments, including embedded banking, has been a double-digit grower and is projected to remain one going forward after sustained investment.
• 💼 Wealth AUM is $74 billion with related fees growing about 14%, supported by the mass affluent focus launched in 2023.
• 🏛️ Deposit competition varies by region and has intensified somewhat with loan growth, but in a flat-rate world Key does not expect meaningful further price moves beyond beta responses to Fed hikes.